These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Surface glycan pattern of canine, equine, and ovine bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells.
    Author: Desantis S, Accogli G, Crovace A, Francioso EG, Crovace AM.
    Journal: Cytometry A; 2018 Jan; 93(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 28906588.
    Abstract:
    The use of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for clinical and experimental studies is increasing, but full characterization of MSCs in veterinary species is hindered by the variability in species-specific cell surface marker expression and antibody cross reactivity. Recent studies demonstrated that the glycans in the glycocalyx of MSCs are promising candidates as cell biomarkers. In the present study, we analyzed the glycocalyx of canine MSCs (cMSCs), ovine MSCs (oMSCs), and equine MSCs (eMSCs) using a cell microarray procedure in which MSCs were spotted on microarray slides and incubated with a panel of 14 biotinylated lectins and Cy3-conjugated streptavidin. The signal intensity was then detected using a microarray scanner. The lectin-binding signals indicated that the MSC surface of the investigated species contained both N- and O-linked glycan types, with N-glycosylation predominating over O-glycosylation and fucosylation being more abundant than sialylation. Relative quantification revealed an interspecific difference between these glycans. In addition, cMSCs expressed more α2,3-linked sialic acid (MAL II), terminal lactosamine (RCA120 ), and α1,6 and α1,3 fucosylated oligosaccharides (PSA, LTA); oMSCs exhibited more T antigen (Jacalin), GalNAcα1,3(LFucα1,2)Galβ1,3/4GlcNAcβ1 (DBA), chitotriose (succinylated WGA), and α1,2-linked fucose (UEA I); and eMSCs showed a higher density of α2,6 sialic acids (SNA) and high mannose N-glycans (Con A). Using cell microarray methodology, we have for the first time demonstrated differences in the glycosylation profiles of cMSC, oMSC, and eMSC surfaces. These results could be valuable as resources and references for MSC differentiation and molecular remodeling in clinical cell-based therapy and tissue engineering studies. © 2017 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]