These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Laparoscopic uterine artery bipolar coagulation plus myomectomy vs traditional laparoscopic myomectomy for "large" uterine fibroids: comparison of clinical efficacy.
    Author: Ciavattini A, Clemente N, Delli Carpini G, Saccardi C, Borgato S, Litta P.
    Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Dec; 296(6):1167-1173. PubMed ID: 28956149.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: Laparoscopic myomectomy is the uterus-preserving surgical approach of choice in case of symptomatic fibroids. However, it can be a difficult procedure even for an experienced surgeon and can result in excessive blood loss, prolonged operating time and postoperative complications. A combined approach with laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion and simultaneous myomectomy was proposed to reduce these complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combined laparoscopic approach in women with symptomatic "large" intramural uterine fibroids, compared to the traditional laparoscopic myomectomy alone. METHODS: Prospective nonrandomized case-controlled study of women who underwent a conservative surgery for symptomatic "large" (≥ 5 cm in the largest diameter) intramural uterine fibroids. The "study group" consisted of women who underwent the combined approach (laparoscopic uterine artery bipolar coagulation and simultaneous myomectomy), while women who underwent the traditional laparoscopic myomectomy constituted the "control group". A comparison between the two groups was performed, and several intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: No significant difference in the overall duration of surgery between women of the "study group" and "control group" emerged; however, a significantly shorter surgical time for myomectomy was observed in the "study group". The intraoperative blood loss and the postoperative haemoglobin drop were significantly lower in the "study group". No difference in the postoperative pain between groups emerged, and the postoperative hospital stay was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic uterine artery bipolar coagulation and simultaneous myomectomy is a safe and effective procedure, even in women with symptomatic "large" intramural uterine fibroids, with the benefit of a significant reduction in the intraoperative blood loss when compared to the traditional laparoscopic myomectomy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]