These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Intrarater Reliability of Range of Motion Measurements of the Uninjured Wrist in Women After Distal Radius Fracture.
    Author: Johnston GHF, Stewart SA.
    Journal: J Hand Surg Am; 2018 Jan; 43(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 29032873.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To determine the intrarater reliability of serial wrist and forearm range of motion (ROM) measurements of the uninjured limb, by 1 evaluator using a standardized technique of measurement, in women who have sustained a distal radius fracture. METHODS: From December 2007 to December 2014, skeletally mature women who had sustained an isolated distal radius fracture routinely had sequential measurements of wrist extension and flexion as well as forearm supination and pronation in both their injured and their uninjured limbs, at a minimum of 3-week intervals. The senior author (G.H.F.J.) used a standardized technique of measurement of ROM throughout this period, and these data related to the uninjured wrist and forearm were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Of 508 women who had a distal radius fracture, 506 had the measurements made of the uninjured wrist and forearm on 2, 300 on 3, and 128 on 4 separate occasions. The average age of the women was 61 years, with a range from 16 to 94 years. The intraclass correlation coefficients between measurements over time for extension, flexion, and supination measurements were 0.71, 0.63, 0.68, respectively, and 0.47 for pronation. The intraclass correlation coefficient varied according to patient age, but without specific progression in any age group for any ROM. Extension, flexion, and supination decreased significantly as age increased, whereas forearm pronation did not. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of wrist and forearm motion of the uninjured limb can be reliably reproduced by a single rater, most so for extension, flexion, and supination, and less so for pronation. Interrater reliability assessment remains to be evaluated. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Given the intrarater reliability of wrist and forearm motion measurement, the opposite (uninjured) wrist probably represents a useful reference metric for motion restoration for recovery from injury to the opposite limb.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]