These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Canine central corneal thickness measurements via Pentacam-HR® , optical coherence tomography (Optovue iVue® ), and high-resolution ultrasound biomicroscopy. Author: Wolfel AE, Pederson SL, Cleymaet AM, Hess AM, Freeman KS. Journal: Vet Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 21(4):362-370. PubMed ID: 29034562. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) values in canine eyes using Pentacam-HR® Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam), Optovue® iVue spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and high-resolution ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and generate normative canine Pentacam CCT values. ANIMALS STUDIED: Twenty-four client-owned dogs (37 eyes) with nondiseased cornea(s) presenting to the Colorado State University Veterinary Teaching Hospital. PROCEDURES: Corneal images were acquired via Pentacam, SD-OCT, and UBM in the listed order. Machine-calculated values of CCT from Pentacam and SD-OCT were compared to operator-measured values from UBM. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to evaluate agreement between instruments. RESULTS: Mean CCT ± SD measured by Pentacam was 629.73 ± 64.57 μm, by SD-OCT was 610.56 ± 57.48 μm, and by UBM was 689.77 ± 55.93 μm. On average, Pentacam CCT was 19.17 ± 32.90 μm (3%) thicker than SD-OCT and 65.12 ± 44.52 μm (10.3%) thinner than UBM. SD-OCT was on average 82.47 μm (13.5% ) thinner than UBM. The 95% limits of agreement were (-45.31, 83.65), (-152.38, 22.13), and (-126.674, -38.270) for Pentacam vs. SD-OCT, Pentacam vs. UBM, and SD-OCT vs. UBM respectively. All differences were statistically significant (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Considering there is an average of 7.5% normal diurnal variation in canine CCT, a 3.0% difference between Pentacam and SD-OCT values is likely not clinically relevant. However, Pentacam measurements were both statistically and clinically significantly different from UBM and SD-OCT measurements.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]