These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Thermoeffector Responses at a Fixed Rate of Heat Production in Heart Failure Patients. Author: Balmain BN, Jay O, Morris NR, Shiino K, Stewart GM, Jayasinghe R, Chan J, Sabapathy S. Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Mar; 50(3):417-426. PubMed ID: 29040221. Abstract: PURPOSE: Heart failure (HF) patients seem to exhibit altered thermoregulatory responses during exercise in the heat. However, the extent to which these responses are altered due to physiological impairments independently of biophysical factors associated with differences in metabolic heat production (Hprod), evaporative heat balance requirements (Ereq), and/or body size is presently unclear. Therefore, we examined thermoregulatory responses in 10 HF patients and 10 age-matched controls (CON) similar in body size during exercise at a fixed rate of Hprod and therefore Ereq in a 30°C environment. METHODS: Rectal temperature, local sweat rate, and cutaneous vascular conductance were measured throughout 60 min of cycle ergometry. Whole-body sweat rate was estimated from pre-post nude body weight corrected for fluid intake. RESULTS: Despite exercising at the same rate of Hprod (HF, 338 ± 43 W; CON, 323 ± 31 W; P = 0.25), the rise in rectal temperature was greater (P < 0.01) in HF (0.81°C ± 0.16°C) than in CON (0.49°C ± 0.27°C). In keeping with a similar Ereq (HF, 285 ± 40 W; CON, 274 ± 28 W; P = 0.35), no differences in whole-body sweat rate (HF, 0.45 ± 0.11 L·h; CON, 0.41 ± 0.07 L·h; P = 0.38) or local sweat rate (HF, 0.96 ± 0.17 mg·cm·min; CON, 0.79 ± 0.15 mg·cm·min; P = 0.50) were observed between groups. However, the rise in cutaneous vascular conductance was lower in HF than in CON (HF, 0.83 ± 0.42 au·mm Hg; CON, 2.10 ± 0.79 au·mm Hg; P < 0.01). In addition, the cumulative body heat storage estimated from partitional calorimetry was similar between groups (HF, 154 ± 106 kJ; CON, 196 ± 174 kJ; P = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these findings demonstrate that HF patients exhibit a blunted skin blood flow response, but no differences in sweating. Given that HF patients had similar body heat storage to that of CON at the same Hprod, their greater rise in core temperature can be attributed to a less uniform internal distribution of heat between the body core and periphery.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]