These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Optimizing Image Quantification for 177Lu SPECT/CT Based on a 3D Printed 2-Compartment Kidney Phantom.
    Author: Tran-Gia J, Lassmann M.
    Journal: J Nucl Med; 2018 Apr; 59(4):616-624. PubMed ID: 29097409.
    Abstract:
    The aim of this work was to find an optimal setup for activity determination of 177Lu-based SPECT/CT imaging reconstructed with 2 commercially available methods (xSPECT Quant and Flash3D). For this purpose, 3-dimensional (3D)-printed phantoms of different geometries were manufactured, different partial-volume correction (PVC) methods were applied, and the accuracy of the activity determination was evaluated. Methods: A 2-compartment kidney phantom (70% cortical and 30% medullary compartment), a sphere, and an ellipsoid of equal volumes were 3D printed, filled with 177Lu, and scanned with a SPECT/CT system. Reconstructions were performed with xSPECT and Flash3D. Different PVC methods were applied to find an optimal quantification setup: method 1 was a geometry-specific recovery coefficient based on the 3D printing model, method 2 was a geometry-specific recovery coefficient based on the low-dose CT scan, method 3 was an enlarged volume of interest including spilled-out counts, method 4 was activity concentration in the peak milliliter applied to the entire CT-based volume, and method 5 was a fixed threshold of 42% of the maximum in a large volume containing the object of interest. Additionally, the influence of postreconstruction gaussian filtering was investigated. Results: Although the recovery coefficients of sphere and ellipsoid differed by only 0.7%, a difference of 31.7% was observed between the sphere and the renal cortex phantoms. Without postfiltering, the model-based recovery coefficients (methods 1 and 2) resulted in the best accuracies (xSPECT, 1.5%; Flash3D, 10.3%), followed by the enlarged volume (method 3) (xSPECT, 8.5%; Flash3D, 13.0%). The peak-milliliter method (method 4) showed large errors only for sphere and ellipsoid (xSPECT, 23.4%; Flash3D, 21.6%). Applying a 42% threshold (method 5) led to the largest quantification errors (xSPECT, 32.3%; Flash3D, 46.7%). After postfiltering, a general increase in the errors was observed. Conclusion: In this work, 3D printing was used as a prototyping technique for a geometry-specific investigation of SPECT/CT reconstruction parameters and PVC methods. The optimal setup for activity determination was found to be an unsmoothed SPECT/CT reconstruction in combination with a recovery coefficient based on the low-dose CT. The difference between spheric and renal recovery coefficients suggests that the typically applied volume-dependent but only sphere-based recovery coefficient lookup tables should be replaced by a more geometry-specific alternative.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]