These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Cost-effectiveness analysis of sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer based on JCOG0605 trial.
    Author: Zhou K, Wen F, Zhang P, Zhou J, Zheng H, Sun L, Li Q.
    Journal: Clin Transl Oncol; 2018 Jun; 20(6):768-774. PubMed ID: 29098555.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: Since combined strategy with cisplatin, etoposide, and irinotecan has shown the superiority to topotecan alone as second-line chemotherapy in patients with sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer, this study aimed to compare these two treatments based on JCOG0605 trail from Chinese cost-effectiveness perspective. METHODS: Basic medical information was derived from a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase III trial (JCOG0605). A Markov model including three health states: progression-free state, progressive disease (PD), and death, was developed to simulate the process of sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer. Cost was calculated from the perspective of Chinese society. Sensitivity analyses were applied to explore the impact of essential variables. RESULTS: Treatment with combination chemotherapy was estimated to increase costs by $6947.32 compared with topotecan alone, with a gain of 0.26 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Thus, the incremental cost-effective ratio was $26720.46/QALY for combination treatment versus monotherapy, which was beyond the threshold of 3 × the per capita GDP of China, $24423.00. The costs of PD state were the most influential factors to the model. CONCLUSION: The combination chemotherapy with cisplatin, etoposide, and irinotecan was not a cost-effectiveness choice for patients with sensitive relapsed SCLC in China from the cost-effectiveness perspective.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]