These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Potential selection bias in candidates for stereotactic radiotherapy for neovascular AMD.
    Author: Ehlken C, Böhringer D, Agostini HT, Grundel B, Stech M.
    Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 256(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 29168044.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT, IRay) was able to reduce the need for intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF (IVI) in patients with neovascular AMD (nAMD) in a phase II randomized clinical trial. Certain morphologic characteristics, such as lesion size < 4 mm2 or lack of fibrosis, were associated with a better response. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to investigate eligibility for SRT in a clinical routine setting and to compare clinical features of eligible and non-eligible patients. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 468 patients treated for nAMD in one study center within a period of 4 months. Clinical features, such as visual acuity or number of IVI since diagnosis and within 6/12 months, as well as the presence for exclusion criteria for SRT were analyzed. Exclusion criteria were sub-divided into lesion-associated (relevant fibrosis, lesion size > 4 mm2, PE tear), ocular comorbidity (e.g., macular comorbidity, vascular disease) and systemic comorbidity (e.g., dementia or tremor). RESULTS: Exclusion criteria were met by 255 patients (54.5%). Exclusion was most dominantly associated with lesion-associated criteria (80.0%) and less often with ocular (20.8%) or systemic (9.4%) comorbidity. A total of 213 patients (45.5%) fulfilled eligibility criteria. Eligible patients had a better VA at time of analysis (0.36 vs. 0.56 logMAR, p < 0.0001) and at baseline (0.38 vs. 0.56 logMAR, p < 0.0001) compared to non-eligible patients. The numbers of previous intravitreal injections since diagnosis in strictly PRN-treated patients served as a surrogate marker for lesion activity and was comparable within the last 6/12 months. Non-eligible patients had a higher number of different anti-VEGF drugs (1.8 vs. 1.6, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: SRT in addition to anti-VEGF can be an option in every second patient with nAMD. Due to morphological exclusion criteria, patients eligible for SRT had a better VA and a better clinical response compared to non-eligible patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]