These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effects of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure on Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: PCOSA Study.
    Author: Hoole SP, Hernández-Sánchez J, Davies WR, McNab DC, Calvert PA, Rana BS, Shapiro LM, Davies MG.
    Journal: Can J Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 33(12):1708-1715. PubMed ID: 29173609.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown a higher prevalence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Right to left shunting through a PFO may be encouraged by the respiratory physiology of OSAS, contributing to the disease pathophysiology. We assessed whether PFO closure would improve respiratory polygraphy parameters compared with baseline measurements in patients with OSAS. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with newly diagnosed OSAS and a moderate-large PFO (prevalence, 18% of 143 patients screened) were referred for PFO closure. The oxygen desaturation index (ODI), apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index (SAQLI) results were compared in these patients at baseline (before continuous positive pressure ventilation [CPAP]) and at 6-month follow-up (after interrupting CPAP for 1 week). RESULTS: All PFOs were safely sealed at 6 months, as confirmed by repeated transthoracic echocardiography. The ODI (44.8 [interquartile range (IQR), 31.2-63.5) vs 42.3 [IQR, 34.0-60.8]; P = 0.89) and AHI (47.9 [IQR, 31.5-65.2] vs 42.3 [IQR, 32.1-63]; P = 0.99) did not change after PFO closure nor did the 6MWT, although the ESS (13.0 [IQR, 12.0-16.8] vs 6.0 [IQR, 4.0-8.8]; P < 0.001) and the SAQLI (3.4 [IQR, 2.8-4.3] vs 4.4 [IQR, 3.9-5.3]; P < 0.001) did improve. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of PFO in OSAS appears to be no higher than that in the general population. Although PFO closure is safe and effective, it did not improve respiratory polygraphy measures of OSAS severity. The improvement in the ESS and SAQLI likely reflect residual benefits from CPAP.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]