These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A reappraisal of small- and large-fiber damage in carpal tunnel syndrome: New insights into the value of the EMLA test for improving diagnostic sensitivity.
    Author: Triki L, Zouari HG, Kammoun R, Kammoun F, Kammoun I, Masmoudi K, Lefaucheur JP.
    Journal: Neurophysiol Clin; 2017 Dec; 47(5-6):427-436. PubMed ID: 29173870.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To reappraise the respective involvement of small- and large-fiber damage in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and to determine the diagnostic sensitivity of autonomic tests compared to conventional nerve conduction study (NCS). METHODS: Thirty-two manual workers complaining of at least unilateral CTS were enrolled. They underwent clinical interview and completed the symptom severity scale of the Boston CTS Questionnaire (sssBCTQ) and the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). In addition, transcarpal NCS was performed to investigate large sensory and motor fibers of the median nerve, while small autonomic fibers were assessed by recording sympathetic skin reflexes (SSR) at the palm and by grading skin wrinkling in response to eutectic mixture of local anesthetic (EMLA) cream application at the pulp of the index finger. For each neurophysiological variable, sensitivity and specificity values for the diagnosis of CTS were calculated and clinical correlations were studied. RESULTS: Among 64 hands examined, 36 were clinically symptomatic, while 22 were clinically asymptomatic and served as controls. Among all the neurophysiological variables studied, only the values of transcarpal sensory nerve conduction velocity and the EMLA test grade were found to be more altered in clinically symptomatic hands, with also a trend towards prolonged distal motor latency. Overall, for the diagnosis of clinically symptomatic CTS, NCS, SSR, and the EMLA test had a sensitivity of 66.7%, 22.2%, and 69.4%, respectively, and a specificity of 72.7%, 90.9%, and 50%, respectively. Combining NCS and the EMLA test led to a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 45.4%. The sssBCTQ (r=-0.34, P=0.009) and the total NPSI score (r=-0.41, P=0.001) correlated to a more altered EMLA test grade, but not to any NCS or SSR variables. In symptomatic hands, burning sensation was associated with more severe small-fiber lesion, while other pain and sensory symptoms were rather found to be reduced in case of large-fiber damage, evidenced by NCS alteration. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the discrepancy between conventional NCS results and clinical presentation of CTS, but still suggests a major involvement of Aβ fibers in the positive sensory symptoms of CTS, excepting burning sensation. On the other hand, the EMLA test was found to correlate with clinical data and to be able to improve sensitivity of neurophysiological investigation in diagnosing CTS.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]