These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Preperitoneal pelvic packing is effective for hemorrhage control in open pelvic fractures.
    Author: Moskowitz EE, Burlew CC, Moore EE, Pieracci FM, Fox CJ, Campion EM, Lawless RA, Cohen MJ.
    Journal: Am J Surg; 2018 Apr; 215(4):675-677. PubMed ID: 29179908.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Open pelvic fractures are life-threatening injuries. Preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP) has been suggested to be ineffective for hemorrhage control in open pelvic fractures. We hypothesize that PPP is effective at hemorrhage control in patients with open pelvic fractures and reduces mortality. METHODS: Patients undergoing PPP from 2005 to 2015 were analyzed. Patients with open pelvic fractures were defined as direct communication of the bony injury with overlying soft tissue, vagina, or rectum. RESULTS: During the 10-year study, 126 patients underwent PPP; 14 (11%) sustained an open pelvic fracture. After PPP, 1 patient (7%) underwent angioembolization with a documented arterial blush. PPP controlled pelvic hemorrhage in all patients. Overall mortality rate was 7% with one death due to traumatic brain injury. CONCLUSIONS: PPP is effective for hemorrhage control in patients with open pelvic fractures. PPP should be used in a standard protocol for hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures regardless of associated perineal injuries.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]