These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A randomized comparison between midazolam and thiopental for elective cesarean section anesthesia. I. Mothers.
    Author: Crawford ME, Carl P, Bach V, Ravlo O, Mikkelsen BO, Werner M.
    Journal: Anesth Analg; 1989 Mar; 68(3):229-33. PubMed ID: 2919758.
    Abstract:
    In a randomized blind trial midazolam (0.3 mg kg-1) was compared with thiopental (4 mg kg-1), both combined with meperidine-nitrous oxide, for elective cesarean section anesthesia in 40 women. We found no statistically significant differences between thiopental and midazolam at induction, during operation or recovery with regard to maintenance doses, change in maternal neurologic status based on a modified Glasgow Coma Scale, systolic blood pressure, and heart rate. Induction time was 120 seconds with midazolam and 111 seconds with thiopental. There were significant differences with regard to diastolic blood pressure. Side effects occurred with approximately equal frequencies, but vomiting was significantly more frequent after thiopental. Perivenous tenderness and erythema occurred in four patients, all after thiopental. Midazolam appears to be a suitable alternative to thiopental for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia for elective cesarean section.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]