These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Preliminary algorithm for differential diagnosis between spinal meningioma and schwannoma using plain magnetic resonance imaging.
    Author: Iwata E, Shigematsu H, Yamamoto Y, Kawasaki S, Tanaka M, Okuda A, Morimoto Y, Masuda K, Koizumi M, Akahane M, Tanaka Y.
    Journal: J Orthop Sci; 2018 Mar; 23(2):408-413. PubMed ID: 29198491.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Preoperative differential diagnosis between spinal meningioma and schwannoma is critical due to the characteristic differences of the surgical treatments. Thus, we aimed to develop an algorithm for the differential diagnosis of these two lesions based on plain MRI findings. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed plain MR images from patients who had undergone surgical treatment for meningiomas and schwannomas in our hospital between 2002 and 2016. Seven findings characteristic of meningioma or schwannoma were considered: (a) low or equal signal intensity on T2-weighted images, (b) obtuse angle from the dura mater, (c) anterior location in the spinal canal, (d) cystic degeneration, (e) lumbar occurrence, (f) oval or round shape, and (g) dumbbell type. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of each MRI finding, following which the algorithm was developed using decision tree analysis. Finally, we examined the usefulness of the algorithm for differential diagnosis between the two lesions. RESULTS: Twenty four patients with meningiomas and 56 with schwannomas were enrolled. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of each finding were as follows: (a) [58%, 100%, 100%, 85%, 88%], (b) [67%, 89%, 73%, 86%, 83%], (c) [29%, 88%, 50%, 74%, 70%], (d) [30%, 96%, 94%, 37%, 50%], (e) [43%, 96%, 96%, 42%, 59%], (f) [33%, 88%, 73%, 57%, 60%], and (g) [25%, 96%, 93%, 35%, 46%]. Significant differences were observed with regard to (a), (b), (d), (e), and (g). The algorithm was developed using these five findings, all of which exhibited high specificity and reliability. Accuracy of the algorithm was 91.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that plain MRI findings can be used to differentiate between spinal meningiomas and schwannomas. Furthermore, our novel algorithm exhibited high accuracy, suggesting that this algorithm may aid in the differential diagnosis of these two lesions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]