These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of PEFR and FEV1 in patients with varying degrees of airway obstruction. Effect of modest altitude.
    Author: Vaughan TR, Weber RW, Tipton WR, Nelson HS.
    Journal: Chest; 1989 Mar; 95(3):558-62. PubMed ID: 2920583.
    Abstract:
    Measurements of FEV1 and PEFR performed on a Jones Pulmonor Spirometer (JPF) were compared with PEFR obtained with a mini-Wright peak flow meter (WPF) in 102 patients. Data were converted to percent predicted. Standard deviations of triplicate measurements were: FEV1, 3.01 percent; JPF, 7.22 percent; and WPF, 5.12 percent. Correlation of best of three measurements was FEV1-JPF r = .758; FEV1-WPF r = .744; and JPF-WPF r = .846. The mean percent predicted of the best of three values of FEV1 was 74.8 percent, JPF 91.4 percent, and WPF 94 percent. These higher values for percent predicted PEFR were obtained throughout the range of FEV1 values. Studies on nine normal volunteers in an atmospheric chamber suggested that higher altitudes may account for higher PEFR values. We conclude that PEFR, measured by either waterless spirometer or mini-Wright peak flow meter, has greater intrasubject variability than FEV1, and it tends to underestimate the degree of pulmonary impairment.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]