These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Association of Active and Passive Components of LV Diastolic Filling With Exercise Intolerance in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Mechanistic Insights From Spironolactone Response.
    Author: Kosmala W, Przewlocka-Kosmala M, Marwick TH.
    Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 May; 12(5):784-794. PubMed ID: 29248640.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the association of left ventricular (LV) untwisting rate (UT) and E/e' ratio with the response of exercise capacity to spironolactone in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). BACKGROUND: In most patients with HFpEF, LV filling abnormalities represent a central component in the development of dyspnea. LV diastolic filling is determined by the interplay of passive (LV stiffness and myocardial collagen content, reflected by E/e' ratio) and active myocardial properties (UT, a precursor to isovolumic pressure decay and contributor to diastolic suction). METHODS: In 194 patients with HFpEF (64 ± 8 years), a complete echocardiogram (including assessment of myocardial deformation and rotational mechanics) was performed. Echocardiography following maximal exercise was undertaken to assess LV systolic and diastolic responses to stress. A subset of 105 patients with an exercise-induced increase in estimated LV filling pressure were randomly assigned to spironolactone 25 mg (n = 51) or placebo (n = 54) for 6 months. RESULTS: Baseline peak Vo2 was associated with UT (β = 0.19; p = 0.01) and E/e' (β = -0.16; p = 0.03), independent of clinical data and exercise reserve in longitudinal deformation and ventricular-arterial coupling. An increase in peak Vo2 with treatment was independently associated with changes in UT (β = 0.28; p = 0.003) and exertional increase in E/e' (β = -0.23; p = 0.01) from baseline to follow-up. A significant interaction with the use of spironolactone on peak Vo2 was found for E/e' (p = 0.02) but not for UT (p = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Both active and passive determinants of LV filling, as reflected by UT and E/e', contribute to reduced exercise capacity in HFpEF. Improvement in functional capacity with a 6-month therapy with spironolactone is associated with improvements in both indices. However, the possible mediating effect of this medication is observed only on E/e'.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]