These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Retrospective analysis of the utility of multiparametric MRI for differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions in women in China.
    Author: Fan WX, Chen XF, Cheng FY, Cheng YB, Xu T, Zhu WB, Zhu XL, Li GJ, Li S.
    Journal: Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jan; 97(4):e9666. PubMed ID: 29369183.
    Abstract:
    We explored the utility of time-resolved angiography with interleaved stochastic trajectories dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (TWIST DCE-MRI), readout segmentation of long variable echo-trains diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging- diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (RESOLVE-DWI), and echo-planar imaging- diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (EPI-DWI) for distinguishing between malignant and benign breast lesions.This retrospective analysis included female patients with breast lesions seen at a single center in China between January 2016 and April 2016. Patients were allocated to a benign or malignant group based on pathologic diagnosis. All patients received routine MRI, RESOLVE-DWI, EPI-DWI, and TWIST DCE-T1WI. Variables measured included quantitative parameters (K, Kep, and Ve), semiquantitative parameters (rate of contrast enhancement for contrast agent inflow [W-in], rate of contrast decay for contrast agent outflow [W-out], and time-to-peak enhancement after contrast agent injection [TTP]) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for RESOLVE-DWI (ADCr) and EPI-DWI (ADCe). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic utility of each parameter for differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions.A total of 87 patients were included (benign, n = 20; malignant, n = 67). Compared with the benign group, the malignant group had significantly higher K, Kep and W-in and significantly lower W-out, TTP, ADCe, and ADCr (all P < .05); Ve was not significantly different between groups. RESOLVE-DWI was superior to conventional EPI-DWI at illustrating lesion boundary and morphology, while ADCr was significantly lower than ADCe in all patients. Kep, W-out, ADCr, and ADCe showed the highest diagnostic efficiency (based on AUC value) for differentiating between benign and malignant lesions. Combining 3 parameters (Kep, W-out, and ADCr) had a higher diagnostic efficiency (AUC, 0.965) than any individual parameter and distinguished between benign and malignant lesions with high sensitivity (91.0%), specificity (95.0%), and accuracy (91.9%).An index combining Kep, W-out, and ADCr could potentially be used for the differential diagnosis of breast lesions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]