These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Staging liver fibrosis with DWI: is there an added value for diffusion kurtosis imaging?
    Author: Yang L, Rao S, Wang W, Chen C, Ding Y, Yang C, Grimm R, Yan X, Fu C, Zeng M.
    Journal: Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):3041-3049. PubMed ID: 29383522.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To assess liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease using diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in comparison with conventional diffusion-weighted imaging, with histology as reference standard. METHODS: This prospective study included 81 patients and DKI with b-values of 0, 200, 500, 1,000, 1,500, 2,000 s/mm2 were performed. Mean diffusivity (MD), mean kurtosis (MK) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were calculated. The diagnostic efficacy of MD, MK and ADC for predicting stage 2 fibrosis or greater, and stage 3 fibrosis or greater were compared. RESULTS: The MD (rho=-0.491, p<0.001), MK (rho=0.537, p<0.001) and ADC (rho=-0.496, p<0.001) correlated significantly with fibrosis stages, and ADC exhibited a strong negative correlation with MK (rho=-0.968; p<0.001) and a moderate association with MD (rho=0.601, p<0.001). Areas under the curves (AUCs) for predicting stage 2 fibrosis or greater were not significantly different (p>0.05) between MK (0.809) and ADC (0.797) as well as between MD (0.715) and ADC. AUCs were also similar for MD (0.710), MK (0.768) and ADC (0.747) for predicting stage 3 fibrosis or greater. CONCLUSION: Although DKI is feasible for predicting liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease, MD and MK offer similar diagnostic performance to ADC values. KEY POINTS: • Diffusion kurtosis imaging is feasible for staging liver fibrosis. • Diffusion kurtosis and monoexponential model are highly correlated. • The kurtosis model offers no added value to the conventional, monoexponential model.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]