These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A Comparative Study of Point-of-Care Prothrombin Time in Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery.
    Author: Okabayashi S, Ogawa S, Tanaka KA, Nishiyama T, Takeshita S, Nakayama Y, Nakajima Y, Sawa T, Mizobe T.
    Journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2018 Aug; 32(4):1609-1614. PubMed ID: 29395816.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Point-of-care (POC) devices allow for prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR) testing in whole blood (WB) and timely administration of plasma or prothrombin complex concentrate during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. This study evaluated the sensitivities of a new POC PT test, a dry-hematology method with heparin neutralization technology (DRIHEMATO PT-S [DRI PT-S]; A&T Corporation, Kanagawa, Japan), and compared it with other POC tests currently available. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: University hospital, single center. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy volunteers and warfarin-treated and cardiac surgical patients. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: In WB samples obtained from 6 healthy volunteers, PT-INR results of DRI PT-S were not affected by an in vitro addition of heparin <6.0 U/mL. In warfarin-treated samples (n = 88, PT/INR 0.98-3.87), PT-INR with DRI PT-S showed acceptable correlation with the laboratory method (r2 = 0.85, p < 0.001). In blood samples obtained from cardiac surgical patients (n = 72), heparin prolonged the PT/INR with the laboratory assay, dry-hematology method with non heparin neutralization technology (DRI PT), Coaguchek XS (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland), and Hemochron Jr. (Accriva Diagnostics, Edison, NJ), but DRI PT-S was not affected by heparin anticoagulation. In nonheparinized samples, different methods between DRI PT-S and the laboratory method yielded acceptable correlations (r2 = 0.76, p < 0.0001). There was a moderate correlation between factor levels and the PT-INR with DRI PT-S (factor [F]II: r2 = 0.63, FVII: r2 = 0.47, FX: r2 = 0.67; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that PT/INR can be accurately assessed using the dry-hematology method in WB under therapeutic heparin levels. Currently available other POC PT/INR tests are affected by heparin, and thus they are not recommended for coagulation monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]