These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Audit of 117 otoplasties for prominent ear by one surgeon using a cartilage-cutting procedure.
    Author: Brian T, Cheng PT, Loo SS.
    Journal: ANZ J Surg; 2019 Mar; 89(3):E66-E70. PubMed ID: 29415346.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The plethora of surgical procedures for prominent ear correction reflects lack of satisfaction with outcomes achieved. This paper describes a cartilage-cutting otoplasty procedure and reports an audit of its outcomes. METHODS: Discharge coding was used to retrospectively identify patients who had undergone the otoplasty of interest at Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, during the 5 years from March 2010 to the end of February 2015. Hospital records were accessed. Demographic, procedure and patient satisfaction data were recorded and analysed (PASW/SPSS Statistics 18.0). Chi-square test and t-test were used to assess associations, with significance accepted at two-sided P < 0.05. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients underwent the specified otoplasty (54.7% females: mean age 9.5 years (standard deviation, SD: 4.2; range: 4-20)), of whom 93.8% had bilateral procedures with mean surgical time of 61 min (SD: 14; range: 34-94). This was significantly shorter (P < 0.001) than for bilateral surgeries by all other techniques and surgeons in the review period. None of the 117 procedures of interest subsequently had suture extrusion or revision surgery. Mean time from surgery to satisfaction determination was 993 days (SD: 521; range: 111-1850) for 43 (67.2%) patients. 23.3% believed that there had been aesthetically insignificant partial recurrence of prominence, typically of one ear only. This was insufficient for all but one patient to consider repeat otoplasty. Surgery outcome was rated 'very satisfactory' and 'satisfactory' by 90.7% and 9.3% of patients/parents, respectively. All would recommend the surgery to others. CONCLUSION: With infrequent complications and recurrence requiring revision, and without long-term reliance on sutures, the otoplasty reported is time-efficient, safe and generates high patient satisfaction.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]