These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Improvement on the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised During the First Four Weeks of Hospital Stay Predicts Outcome at Discharge in Intensive Rehabilitation After Severe Brain Injury.
    Author: Portaccio E, Morrocchesi A, Romoli AM, Hakiki B, Taglioli MP, Lippi E, Di Renzone M, Grippo A, Macchi C, Intensive Rehabilitation Unit Study Group of the IRCCS Don Gnocchi Foundation, Italy.
    Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2018 May; 99(5):914-919. PubMed ID: 29428346.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prognostic utility of serial assessment on the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) during the first 4 weeks of intensive rehabilitation in patients surviving a severe brain injury. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: An intensive rehabilitation unit. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=110) consecutively admitted to the intensive rehabilitation unit. Inclusion criteria were (1) a diagnosis of unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) or minimally conscious state (MCS) caused by an acquired brain injury, and (2) aged >18 years. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent clinical evaluations using the Italian version of the CRS-R during the first month of hospital stay. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Behavioral classification on the CRS-R and the score on the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at final discharge. Patients transitioning from UWS to MCS or emergence from MCS (E-MCS), and from MCS to E-MCS were classified as patients with improved responsiveness (IR). RESULTS: After a mean ± SD hospital stay of 5.3±2.7 months, 59 of 110 patients (53.6%) achieved IR. In the multivariable analysis, a higher CRS-R score change at week 4 (odds ratio =1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49-2.66; P<.001) was the only significant predictor of IR at discharge. Fifty-three patients (48.2%) were classified as severely impaired at discharge (GOS=3). In the multivariable analysis, higher GOS scores were related to a higher CRS-R score at admission (B=.051; 95% CI, .027-.074; P<.001), a higher CRS-R score change at week 4 (B=.087; 95% CI, .064-.110; P<.001), and an absence of severe infections (B=-.477; 95% CI, -.778 to -.176; P=.002). CONCLUSIONS: An improvement on the total CRS-R score and on different subscales across the first 4 weeks of inpatient rehabilitation discriminates patients who will have a better outcome at discharge, providing information for rehabilitation planning and for communication with patients and their caregivers.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]