These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Lactate Level Versus Lactate Clearance for Predicting Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock Defined by Sepsis-3.
    Author: Ryoo SM, Lee J, Lee YS, Lee JH, Lim KS, Huh JW, Hong SB, Lim CM, Koh Y, Kim WY.
    Journal: Crit Care Med; 2018 Jun; 46(6):e489-e495. PubMed ID: 29432347.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of lactate level and lactate clearance at 6 hours after septic shock recognition. And, we performed it to determine lactate kinetics in the Sepsis-3 defined septic shock. DESIGN: This retrospective study was performed from a prospective septic shock registry. SETTINGS: This study was performed at single urban tertiary center. And, all patients were treated with protocol-driven resuscitation bundle therapy between 2010 and 2016. PATIENTS: We included septic shock patients who met the Sepsis-3 definition, which involves lactate levels greater than or equal to 2 mmol/L and vasopressor use. INTERVENTIONS: Serum lactate levels were measured at initial and 6 hours from septic shock recognition. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Lactate clearance was calculated as ([initial lactate - 6-hr lactate]/initial lactate) × 100. The prognostic value of measured lactate levels and lactate clearance for 28-day mortality was analyzed and compared with that of subsequent lactate levels greater than or equal to 2 mmol/L, greater than or equal to 3 mmol/L, and greater than or equal to 4 mmol/L and less than 10%, less than 20%, and less than 30% lactate clearance. A total of 1,060 septic shock patients by Sepsis-3, 265 patients died (28-d mortality: 25%). In survivor, groups had lower median 6-hour lactate level and higher lactate clearance than nonsurvivors (2.5 vs 4.6 mmol/L and 35.4% vs 14.8%; p < 0.01). Both lactate and lactate clearance were associated with mortality after adjusting for confounders (odd ratio, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.21-1.34] and 0.992 [95% CI, 0.989-0.995]), but lactate had a significantly higher prognostic value than lactate clearance (area under the curve, 0.70 vs 0.65; p < 0.01). The prognostic value of subsequent lactate levels (≥ 2, ≥ 3, and ≥ 4 mmol/L) and lactate clearances (< 10%, < 20%, and < 30%) was not significantly differed. However, lactate levels of greater than or equal to 2 mmol/L had the greatest sensitivity (85.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate lactate and lactate clearance are both useful targets in patients with septic shock defined by Sepsis-3. Serum lactate level at 6-hour can be an easier and more effective tool for prognosis of septic shock patients who were treated with protocol-driven resuscitation bundle therapy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]