These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Computer Simulation and Optimization of Cranial Vault Distraction.
    Author: Foley MJ, Cottler PS, Blemker SS, Denny AD, Black JS.
    Journal: Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 Mar; 55(3):356-361. PubMed ID: 29437511.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to validate the proof of concept of a computer-simulated cranial distraction, demonstrating accurate shape and end volume. DESIGN: Detailed modeling was performed on pre- and postoperative computed tomographic (CT) scans to generate accurate measurements of intracranial volume. Additionally, digital distraction simulations were performed on the preoperative scan and the resultant intracranial volume and shape were evaluated. SETTING: Tertiary Children's Hospital. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Preoperative and postoperative CT images were used from 10 patients having undergone cranial distraction for cephalocranial disproportion. INTERVENTIONS: None; computer simulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Computer simulation feasibility of cranial vault distraction was demonstrated through creation of digital osteotomies, simulating distraction through translating skull segments, followed by simulated consolidation. Accuracy of the model was evaluated through comparing the intracranial volumes of actual and simulated distracted skulls. RESULTS: The developed digital distraction simulation was performed on the CT images of 10 patients. Plotting the relationship between the actual and simulated postdistraction volumes for the 10 patients yielded a slope of 1.0 and a correlation coefficient of 0.99. The average actual resultant volume change from distraction was 77.0 mL, compared to a simulated volume change of 76.9 mL. CONCLUSIONS: Digital simulation of cranial distraction was demonstrated through manipulation of the CT images and confirmed by comparing the actual to simulated volume change. This process may provide objective data in designing an individual distraction plan to optimize volume expansion and resultant cranial shape as well as patient education.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]