These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Pulmonary vein activity does not predict the outcome of catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: A long-term multicenter prospective study.
    Author: Prabhu S, Kalla M, Peck KY, Voskoboinik A, McLellan AJA, Pathik B, Nalliah CJ, Wong GR, Sugumar H, Azzopardi SM, Lee G, Ling LH, Kalman JM, Kistler PM.
    Journal: Heart Rhythm; 2018 Jul; 15(7):980-986. PubMed ID: 29501669.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) remains the cornerstone of catheter ablation (CA) in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) (PeAF), although less successful than for paroxysmal AF. Whether rapid or fibrillatory (PV AF) PV firing may identify patients with PeAF more likely to benefit from a PV-based ablation approach is unclear. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the PV cycle length (PVCL) and the PV AF outcome after CA. METHODS: Before ablation, the multipolar catheter was placed in each PV and the left atrial appendage (LAA) for 100 consecutive cycles. The presence of PV AF, the average PVCL of all 4 veins (PV4VAverage), the fastest vein average (PVFVAverage), the fastest cycle length (PVFast) both individually and relative to the average LAA cycle length were calculated. The ablation strategy included PVI and posterior wall isolation with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients underwent CA (age 62 ± 9.1 years; CHA2DS2-VASC score 1.6 ± 1.1; left ventricular ejection fraction 48% ± 13%; left atrial area 31 ± 8.7 cm2; AF duration 16 ± 17 months). PVI was achieved in 100% of patients. Multiprocedure success (MPS; freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia episodes lasting >30 seconds) was achieved in 76% of patients at 24 ± 8.1 months of follow-up after 1.2 ± 0.4 procedures. PV activity was not associated with MPS either absolutely (PV4VAverage [MPS no vs yes: 178 ± 27 ms vs 177 ± 24 ms; P = .92], PVFVAverage [P = .69], or PVFast [P = .82]) or as a ratio relative to the LAA cycle length (PV4VAverage/LAA 1.05 ± 0.11 vs 1.06 ± 0.21; P = .87). The presence of PV AF (31% vs 47%; P = .13) did not predict MPS. CONCLUSION: The rapidity of PV firing or presence of fibrillation within the PV was not predictive of outcome of CA for PeAF. PV activity does not identify patients most likely to benefit from a PV-based ablation strategy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]