These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Management of Pylorus During Esophagectomy. To Drain or Not to Drain?
    Author: Kykalos S, Ntikoudi E.
    Journal: Chirurgia (Bucur); 2018; 113(1):162-163. PubMed ID: 29509543.
    Abstract:
    Dear Editor, delayed gastric emptying due to bilateral vagotomy after esophagectomy, has been associated with increased aspiration rates, prolonged hospital stay and impaired quality of life. A pyloric drainage procedure in an effort to reduce its incidence, most commonly a pyloroplasty, represented for years a standard part of distal esophagectomy. This trend has been reevaluated nowadays and the question that still remains open is whether we should further keep on draining pylorus during esophagectomy or not. Surgical pyloric drainage (pyloroplasty/pyloromyotomy), although effective, is directly related to respectable complication rates, such as leakage, bile reflux, dumping sydrome or even postoperative stenosis, with potential fatal outcome. There are several proposed techniques for performing a pyloroplasty nowadays. Heineke- Mikulicz variant is the most widely practiced pyloroplasty (in contrary to Finney or Jaboulay alternatives) and is ideally performed via a 5-cm-long fullthickness antroduodenal longitudinal incision. Pyloroplasty can also be safely performed with a circular or linear stapler, while laparoscopic assisted trans-oral stapled pyloroplasty is also feasible (1).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]