These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Value of ictal and interictal epileptiform discharges and high frequency oscillations for delineating the epileptogenic zone in patients with focal cortical dysplasia.
    Author: Cuello-Oderiz C, von Ellenrieder N, Sankhe R, Olivier A, Hall J, Dubeau F, Gotman J.
    Journal: Clin Neurophysiol; 2018 Jun; 129(6):1311-1319. PubMed ID: 29523391.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: There are different neurophysiological markers of the Epileptogenic Zone (EZ), but their sensitivity and specificity for the EZ is not known in Focal Cortical Dysplasia (FCD) patients. METHODS: We studied patients with FCD who underwent stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) and surgery. We marked in the SEEG: (a) typical and atypical interictal epileptiform patterns, (b) ictal onset patterns, and (c) rates of ripples (80-250 Hz) and fast ripples (FRs) (>250 Hz). High frequency oscillations were marked automatically during one hour of deep sleep. Surgical outcome was defined as good (Engel I) or poor (Engel II-IV). We computed the sensitivity and, as a measure of specificity, the false positive rate to identify the EZ, and compared them across the different neurophysiological markers. RESULTS: We studied 21 patients, 19 with FCD II. Ictal and typical interictal pattern were the markers with highest sensitivity, while the atypical interictal pattern had the lowest. We found no significant difference in specificity among markers. However, there is a tendency that FRs had the lowest false positive rate. CONCLUSION: The typical interictal pattern has the highest sensitivity. The clinical use of FRs is limited by their low sensitivity. SIGNIFICANCE: We suggest to analyze the typical interictal pattern first. FRs should be analyzed in a second step. If, for instance, a focus with FRs and no typical interictal pattern is found, this area could be considered for resection.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]