These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Development of clinically relevant QA procedures for the BrainLab ExacTrac imaging system.
    Author: Iftimia I, Halvorsen PH.
    Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):108-113. PubMed ID: 29524294.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop Quality Assurance procedures for the BrainLab ExacTrac (ET) imaging system following the TG 142 recommendations for planar kV imaging systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A custom-designed 3D printed holder was used to position the Standard Imaging QCkV-1 phantom at isocenter, facing the ET X ray tubes. The linac's light field (collimator at 45⁰) was used to position the phantom holder. The ET images were exported to ARIA where geometric distortion was checked. The DICOM images were analyzed in the PIPSpro software. The following parameters were recorded (technique 80 kV/2mAs): spatial resolution (Modulated Transfer Function (MTF) F50/F40/F30), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and noise. A baseline was generated for future image analysis. Beam quality and exposure were measured using the Unfors R/F detector. Using a rod holder, the detector was placed at isocenter, facing each ET X-ray tube. The measurements were performed for all preset protocols ranging from cranial low (80 kV/6.3 mAs) to abdomen high (145 kV/25 mAs). The total exposure was converted to dose. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The image quality parameters were close for the two tubes. A common baseline was therefore generated. The average baseline values (both tubes, both images/tube) were 1.06/1.18/1.30, 1.32, and 67.3 for the MTF F50/F40/F30, noise, and CNR respectively. The procedure described here was used for another 24 sets. Using a positioning template and 3D printed phantom holder, experimental reproducibility has been acceptably high. The measured phantom dimensions were within 1 mm from the nominal values. The measured kV values were within 2% of the nominal values. The exposure values for the two tubes were comparable. The range of total measured dose was 0.099 mGy (cranial low) to 1.353 mGy (abdomen high). CONCLUSIONS: A reliable process has been implemented for QA of the ET imaging system by characterizing the system's performance at isocenter, consistent with clinical conventions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]