These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Antigen-specific T-cell hyporesponsiveness in MRL congenic mice can be explained by two independent cellular defects.
    Author: Waterfield JD, Fairhurst M, Chu R, Levy JG.
    Journal: Immunology; 1987 Jun; 61(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 2954899.
    Abstract:
    MRL-+, MRL-lpr and B6-lpr have been shown to be useful models in studying systemic lupus erythematosus. MRL-lpr and B6-lpr differ from their congenic counterparts by the presence and expression of the homozygous recessive lymphoproliferation (lpr) gene. One manifestation of this gene is a massive T-cell proliferation that results in a generalized lymphadenopathy in older animals. A paradox that has developed out of the work utilizing the congenic mice is that the gene responsible for lymphoproliferation also appears to be responsible for the inability of T cells to respond to proliferative signals in vitro. In this paper we investigate the basis for this hyporesponsiveness in antigen-induced activation of proliferation and antibody synthesis. We have demonstrated that spleen cells from both MRL-+ and MRL-lpr mice gave minimal stimulation in a one-way mixed lymphocyte reaction against allogeneic T cells. These findings were extended to include antigen-specific proliferation involving antigen that must be processed and presented to responder lymphocytes in a H-2 restricted manner. Thus, MRL-+ and MRL-lpr spleen cells pulsed with ferredoxin also failed to stimulate ferredoxin-primed T cells from B10.Br animals in vitro. We then investigated whether any T-cell defect(s) was also contributing to this proliferative hyporesponsiveness. T lymphocytes from the spleen of MRL-+, 2-month-old MRL-lpr, and 6-month-old MRL-lpr were tested in a one-way mixed lymphocyte reaction. It was found that only the MRL-+ T cells gave responses approaching normal, suggesting lpr gene involvement in T-cell non-responsiveness. This was confirmed by the demonstration of an age-onset T-cell proliferative hyporesponsiveness in B6-lpr mice. This lpr gene-linked non-responsiveness was also shown to extend to T-cell helper function in a positive allogeneic effect assay. We can conclude from these studies that antigenic nonresponsiveness in MRL congenic mice can be explained by two defects: the failure of antigen-presenting cells in MRL-+ and MRL-lpr mice to provide the necessary signal(s) to immunocompetent T cells, this defect not being associated with the lpr gene, and the lpr gene controlled outgrowth of a unique T-cell population that cannot respond in our assay systems.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]