These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Development of a partitioned liquid-liquid extraction- dispersive solid phase extraction procedure followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for analysis of 3-monochloropropane-1,2-diol diesters in edible oils.
    Author: Custodio-Mendoza JA, Lorenzo RA, Valente IM, Almeida PJ, Lage MA, Rodrigues JA, Carro AM.
    Journal: J Chromatogr A; 2018 May 04; 1548():19-26. PubMed ID: 29555360.
    Abstract:
    A fast and effective method using a modified QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged and Safe) approach which includes partitioned liquid-liquid extraction (PLLE) and dispersive solid phase extraction (dSPE) clean-up step for the determination of seven 3-monochloropropane-1,2-diol (3-MCPD) fatty acid diesters in vegetable oils is developed and validated according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines. Due to the complexity of the matrices, combination of silica based sorbents (Silica Strong Anion Exchange (Si-SAX), Supel™ QuE Z-Sep+ (Z-Sep+) and Primary Secondary Amine (PSA) were tested for lipid removal. The effect of several experimental factors on the efficiency of the extraction procedure was studied by a screening design 3422//16 and a response surface Doehlert design. The separation and determination was carried out by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The method provided suitable linearity (r2 > 0.9960), precision (relative standard deviation (RSD) lower than 10%) and accuracy, in terms of recovery. The limits of detection (LOD) and limits of quantification (LOQ) ranged from 10 to 20 μg kg -1 and from 25 to 50 μg kg-1, respectively. The recoveries at three spiking levels of 100, 250, and 500 μg kg-1 were over the range of 71.4-122.9% with RSD lower than 13%. The method was successfully applied in edible oils and fatty food samples. The results provide valuable information to assess the risk of exposure to these foodborne contaminants.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]