These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Thoracic-abdominal imaging with a novel dual-layer spectral detector CT: intra-individual comparison of image quality and radiation dose with 128-row single-energy acquisition.
    Author: Haneder S, Siedek F, Doerner J, Pahn G, Grosse Hokamp N, Maintz D, Wybranski C.
    Journal: Acta Radiol; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1458-1465. PubMed ID: 29569933.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: A novel, multi-energy, dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography (SDCT) is commercially available now with the vendor's claim that it yields the same or better quality of polychromatic, conventional CT images like modern single-energy CT scanners without any radiation dose penalty. PURPOSE: To intra-individually compare the quality of conventional polychromatic CT images acquired with a dual-layer spectral detector (SDCT) and the latest generation 128-row single-energy-detector (CT128) from the same manufacturer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty patients underwent portal-venous phase, thoracic-abdominal CT scans with the SDCT and prior CT128 imaging. The SDCT scanning protocol was adapted to yield a similar estimated dose length product (DLP) as the CT128. Patient dose optimization by automatic tube current modulation and CT image reconstruction with a state-of-the-art iterative algorithm were identical on both scanners. CT image contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was compared between the SDCT and CT128 in different anatomic structures. Image quality and noise were assessed independently by two readers with 5-point-Likert-scales. Volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), and DLP were recorded and normalized to 68 cm acquisition length (DLP68). RESULTS: The SDCT yielded higher mean CNR values of 30.0% ± 2.0% (26.4-32.5%) in all anatomic structures ( P < 0.001) and excellent scores for qualitative parameters surpassing the CT128 (all P < 0.0001) with substantial inter-rater agreement (κ ≥ 0.801). Despite adapted scan protocols the SDCT yielded lower values for CTDIvol (-10.1 ± 12.8%), DLP (-13.1 ± 13.9%), and DLP68 (-15.3 ± 16.9%) than the CT128 (all P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The SDCT scanner yielded better CT image quality compared to the CT128 and lower radiation dose parameters.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]