These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of DWI Methods in the Pediatric Brain: PROPELLER Turbo Spin-Echo Imaging Versus Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging Versus Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging.
    Author: Kim TH, Baek MY, Park JE, Ryu YJ, Cheon JE, Kim IO, Choi YH.
    Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1352-1358. PubMed ID: 29570373.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare DWI for pediatric brain evaluation using single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI), periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (Blade), and readout-segmented EPI (Resolve). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blade, Resolve, and single-shot EPI were performed for 27 pediatric patients (median age, 9 years), and three datasets were independently reviewed by two radiologists. Qualitative analyses were performed for perceptive coarseness, image distortion, susceptibility-related changes, motion artifacts, and lesion conspicuity using a 5-point Likert scale. Quantitative analyses were conducted for spatial distortion and signal uniformity of each sequence. RESULTS: Mean scores were 2.13, 3.17, and 3.76 for perceptive coarseness; 4.85, 3.96, and 2.19 for image distortion; 4.76, 3.96, and 2.30 for susceptibility-related change; 4.96, 3.83, and 4.69 for motion artifacts; and 2.71, 3.75, and 1.92 for lesion conspicuity, for Blade, Resolve, and single-shot EPI, respectively. Blade and Resolve showed better quality than did single-shot EPI for image distortion, susceptibility-related changes, and lesion conspicuity. Blade showed less image distortion, fewer susceptibility-related changes, and fewer motion artifacts than did Resolve, whereas lesion conspicuity was better with Resolve. Blade showed increased signal variation compared with Resolve and single-shot EPI (coefficients of variation were 0.10, 0.08, and 0.05 for lateral ventricle; 0.13, 0.09, and 0.05 for centrum semiovale; and 0.16, 0.09, and 0.06 for pons in Blade, Resolve, and single-shot EPI, respectively). CONCLUSION: DWI with Resolve or Blade yields better quality regarding distortion, susceptibility-related changes, and lesion conspicuity, compared with single-shot EPI. Blade is less susceptible to motion artifacts than is Resolve, whereas Resolve yields less noise and better lesion conspicuity than does Blade.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]