These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [ADVANCES IN THE TREATMENT OF RETINOBLASTOMA AT HADASSAH IN THE LAST THREE DECADES].
    Author: Frenkel S, Weintraub M, Rot I, Shoshani N, Pe'er J.
    Journal: Harefuah; 2018 Mar; 157(3):149-153. PubMed ID: 29582943.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: Retinoblastoma (RB) is a malignant tumor presenting in the eyes of infants and children, which endangers life, the eye and vision. The treatment of RB has undergone marked changes in recent years, and great progress has been made in our ability to preserve eyes. Over the last three decades most Israeli patients with RB have been treated in the National Specialty Ocular Oncology Service at the Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center in Jerusalem. AIMS: To describe advances in the primary treatment of RB with an emphasis on eye-preserving treatments. METHODS: The study included a retrospective cohort of patients who were diagnosed and treated at our center over the last three decades. Review of patients' records was approved by the Hadassah IRB. RESULTS: From 1988 to 2014 we diagnosed 290 children (138 girls - 47.6%). The mean age at diagnosis (±SE) was 18.1±1.2 months, median 12.5 months. RB was unilateral in 55.6% of the cases, bilateral in 41.3% and unilateral multifocal in 3.1%. There was an even distribution of disease severity (IRB grouping). Since the advent of IV chemotherapy (IVC) there has been a decrease in the rate of eye enucleation from ~90% to ~30% of the children until the year 2000 with a stable rate thereafter. In the years 1990-2000 there was an increase followed by a decrease in the use of primary external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and a parallel small increase in the use of brachytherapy from the mid '90s until today. The recently introduced novel treatments - intravitreal (IVitC) and intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) - were used as a complimentary treatment to IVC, and not yet as a single primary modality until 2014. CONCLUSIONS: IVC replaced the need to enucleate in most of the cases, but 30% of children still require a primary enucleation. DISCUSSION: IVC usually requires additive treatments (thermal-cryotherapy, trans-pupillary thermotherapy - TTT, brachytherapy and/or local chemotherapy - IVitC and IAC) and with the use of multi-modal therapy many eyes can be preserved. In the period reported in the current manuscript, the use of IAC as a primary treatment approach was only used in isolated cases. In Summary, There have been significant advances in our ability to save eyes, and the field continues to progress.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]