These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The influence of temporomandibular joint movement parameters on dental morphology.
    Author: Oancea L, Stegaroiu R, Cristache CM.
    Journal: Ann Anat; 2018 Jul; 218():49-58. PubMed ID: 29625251.
    Abstract:
    UNLABELLED: Association between tooth morphology, occlusal relations and mandibular condyle/glenoid fossa morphology is still a controversial issue in dentistry. The aim of the present study was to examine the influence of three important articular parameters on the dental morphology and the crown volume, quantifying the variation for each tooth group: incisor, canine, premolar and molar. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All maxillary teeth from a set of basic study models were prepared for zirconia single crowns. The models were scanned and then, using a computer aided design software, they were mounted in a virtual articulator and specific mandibular movements were defined. The crown morphology was designed and statically adapted. Ten models were obtained by dynamical adjustment of the basic model for successively modified articular parameters: sagittal condylar inclination (SCI)=30°, Bennett angle (BA)=10°, Immediate side shift (ISS)=0.5mm - for control and SCI: 40°, 50° and 60° with BA and ISS as control, BA: 15°, 20° and 25° with SCI and ISS as control, ISS: 1.5mm, 1.0mm and 0.0mm with SCI and BA as control - for the nine test models. The following measurements were performed three times on the right side of each model: volume for each tooth group, slope (S) for the central incisor, S and mesio-distal angle (MDA) for canine, S, MDA and vestibulo-oral angle (VOA) for the first premolar and molar. RESULTS: When SCI was varied, statistically significant changes as compared to the controls were found for incisor's and premolar's S, premolar's VOA and, for 50° and 60°, MDA and molar's MDA (for 50°) and VOA (for 60°). When BA was varied, significant changes were found for S (canine) and, in certain models, MDA (premolar, molar). Variations of ISS significantly changed mainly MDA for molars and, in two models, premolars. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this study, among the articular parameters, SCI mostly influenced the dynamic tooth morphology, but canine and molar morphology was stronger influenced by BA and/or ISS.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]