These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Interference of DOACs in different DRVVT assays for diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants.
    Author: Flieder T, Weiser M, Eller T, Dittrich M, von Bargen K, Alban S, Kuhn J, Knabbe C, Birschmann I.
    Journal: Thromb Res; 2018 May; 165():101-106. PubMed ID: 29627719.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Determination of lupus anticoagulants (LA) is an important, but still challenging test in the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). This is especially the case in patients using one of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The aim of our study was to examine the influence of these drugs on DRVVT assays from two companies (in each case: screening test, confirming test and calculated ratio) and on aPTT and lupus-sensitive aPTT. METHODS: We used plasma samples from healthy volunteers spiked with the DOACs dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban (0, 10, 30, 50, 100 ng/mL) for testing. Furthermore, samples from patients receiving a DOAC were investigated. The plasma concentrations of the DOACs were determined using ultra-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). RESULTS: Depending on type and concentration, all the DOACs resulted in pathological values in the DRVVT screening assays. In samples spiked with apixaban, no influence on the DRVVT normalized ratio of the two assays was observed, but 7 to 15% of samples from patients receiving apixaban displayed pathological values. In contrast, up to 71% of dabigatran-spiked samples showed normalized ratio values above the cut-off, whereas there was no influence in the patients' samples. In both spiked and patient samples containing rivaroxaban, the DRVVT assays were influenced. CONCLUSION: LA diagnostics should, under DOAC therapy, be limited to situations in which time-critical evaluation is warranted. It is crucial to take into account the finding that even samples containing DOAC concentrations below the limit of detection of the drugs may lead to false-positive DRVVT measurements.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]