These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Human epidermal cells from ultraviolet light-exposed skin preferentially activate autoreactive CD4+2H4+ suppressor-inducer lymphocytes and CD8+ suppressor/cytotoxic lymphocytes.
    Author: Baadsgaard O, Fox DA, Cooper KD.
    Journal: J Immunol; 1988 Mar 15; 140(6):1738-44. PubMed ID: 2964481.
    Abstract:
    In vivo exposure of human epidermis to UV abrogates the function of T6+DR+ Langerhans cells and induces the appearance of Ag-presenting T6-DR+ OKM5+ cells in the epidermis. Since UV exposure of murine skin results in Ts lymphocyte activation, we investigated the capacity of human epidermal cells (EC) harvested 3 days after in vivo UV exposure to activate regulatory and effector autologous T lymphocyte subsets. T lymphocytes were separated into CD8+ suppressor/cytotoxic lymphocytes and CD4+ helper/inducer lymphocytes by C lysis and panning. The CD4+ subset was further divided by using the 2H4 mAB to obtain CD4+2H4+ lymphocytes (inducers of TS lymphocytes) and CD4+2H4- lymphocytes (inducers of B cell Ig production and inducers of cytotoxic T cells). Unirradiated suction blister-derived EC from control skin (C-EC) and from skin exposed in vivo to UV (UV-EC) were cultured with purified autologous T lymphocyte subsets in the absence of added Ag. The resultant T lymphocyte proliferation was detected by [3H]thymidine uptake. UV-EC were highly effective in the stimulation of CD4+ lymphocytes, whereas C-EC were poor stimulators. The stimulator effect of UV-EC was abrogated after depletion of DR+ UV-EC. When CD4+ lymphocytes were fractionated, UV-EC consistently demonstrated enhanced ability to stimulate suppressor-inducer CD4+2H4+ lymphocytes relative to C-EC. Although less responsive than CD4+2H4+ lymphocytes, CD4+2H4- lymphocytes also demonstrated greater proliferation to UV-EC than to C-EC. Neither UV-EC nor C-EC were able to activate CD8+ lymphocytes devoid of CD4+ lymphocytes. However, after addition of rIL-2 at concentrations that allow binding only to the high affinity IL-2R on T lymphocytes, UV-EC induced vigorous proliferation of CD8+ lymphocytes, whereas C-EC induced only background levels of proliferation. C lysis of leukocytes resident within UV-EC resulted in 66 to 70% reduction of CD8+ lymphocyte proliferation. In conclusion, UV-EC may activate CD8+ lymphocytes by at least two pathways: (1) UV-EC activation of CD4+2H4+ lymphocytes may induce differentiation/proliferation of CD8+ suppressor cells and (2) UV-EC activation of CD4+ cells may induce IL-2 production, that, in combination with UV-induced epidermal leukocytes, stimulates CD8+ cells.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]