These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effect of intravascular contrast agent on diffusion and perfusion fraction coefficients in the peripheral zone and prostate cancer.
    Author: Mazaheri Y, Hötker AM, Shukla-Dave A, Akin O, Hricak H.
    Journal: Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Sep; 51():120-127. PubMed ID: 29678542.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To determine whether water diffusion and the perfusion fraction coefficients in prostate peripheral zone (PZ) and prostate cancer (PCa) are affected by intravenous contrast injection and explore the potential mechanism behind previously reported differences between pre- and post-contrast ADC values. METHODS: Our institutional review board waived informed consent for this HIPAA-compliant, retrospective study, which included 32 patients (median age, 63 years; range, 47-77 years) with biopsy-proven, untreated PCa who underwent 3-Tesla MRI, including DW-MRI at b-values 0, 400, 700, 1000 s/mm2 before and after gadolinium injection. For regions of interest (ROIs) in presumed benign PZ and PZ PCa, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), perfusion fraction f, and diffusion coefficient D were estimated voxel-wise, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) were estimated. Pre- and post-contrast measurements were compared by Wilcoxon signed-rank test; P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In PZ, f (P = 0.002) was significantly higher on post-contrast imaging than on pre-contrast imaging, but ADC and D values did not change significantly (P = 0.562 and 0.295 respectively). In PCa, all parameters differed significantly between post-contrast and pre-contrast imaging (P < 0.0001 for ADC, P = 0.0084 for D, and P = 0.029 for f). On post-contrast imaging, SNR was not significantly different in PZ (P = 0.260) but was significantly lower in PCa (P < 0.0001); CNR did not change significantly (P = 0.059). CONCLUSION: After contrast injection, ADC and D declined significantly in PCa only, while f increased significantly in both PCa and PZ. Pre- and post-contrast diffusion parameters cannot be used interchangeably for diagnostic purposes that require quantitative diffusion estimates.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]