These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Difference in analgesia following epidural blockade in patients with postoperative or chronic low back pain. Author: Raj PP, Knarr D, Vigdorth E, Gregg RV, Denson DD, Edström HH. Journal: Pain; 1988 Jul; 34(1):21-27. PubMed ID: 2970056. Abstract: Subjective responses of continuous epidural analgesia with bupivacaine were compared in 30 patients with acute (postoperative) or chronic (low back) pain. In the acute pain patients, sensory block was 4 dermatomes at 9 h and 6 dermatomes at 64 h. Corresponding values in the chronic pain patients were 8 and 6 dermatomes respectively. Motor blockade of the lower limbs was more profound in the acute pain group. The acute pain patients had significantly better pain relief (VAS: 85-96% vs. 55-70%) and a significantly higher proportion of these patients reported a global score of 3 (excellent; 80% vs. 7%). The mean dosage of bupivacaine decreased in the acute pain group from 21.0 +/- 5.7 (mean +/- S.D.) mg/h at 9 h to 15.1 +/- 8.5 mg/h at 64 h. Corresponding values for the chronic pain group were 20.7 +/- 5.9 and 12.0 +/- 6.0 mg/h respectively. Mean plasma concentration of bupivacaine increased from 1.2 +/- 0.8 micrograms/ml at 9 h to 2.1 +/- 1.4 micrograms/ml at 64 h in the acute pain patients and was 0.8 +/- 0.3 micrograms/ml at 9 h to 1.0 +/- 1.0 micrograms/ml at 64 h in the chronic pain patients. The incidence of side effects was approximately the same in both groups. No signs of accumulation or toxic reactions to bupivacaine were seen.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]