These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The mutational analysis in the diagnostic work-up of thyroid nodules: the real impact in a center with large experience in thyroid cytopathology.
    Author: Macerola E, Rago T, Proietti A, Basolo F, Vitti P.
    Journal: J Endocrinol Invest; 2019 Feb; 42(2):157-166. PubMed ID: 29704233.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is a mainstay in the evaluation of thyroid nodules, but fails to reach reliable results in 25-30% of cases. The role of molecular markers in helping clinical decisions has been investigated for the last years, but their clinical usefulness is still unsettled. METHODS: Mutation analysis of BRAF, RAS genes and TERT promoter was performed in a series of 617 consecutive cytological specimens undergoing FNA. RESULTS: The 617 nodules had the following cytological diagnosis: non diagnostic 22 (3.6%), benign 425 (68.9%), indeterminate 114 (18.5%), suspicious 11 (1.8%) and malignant 45 (7.3%). BRAF mutations were found in 31 cases (5.0%), all but two in suspicious and malignant nodules. RAS mutations were detected in 47 samples (7.6%): 25 benign (5.9%) and 19 indeterminate nodules (16.7%). TERT promoter mutation alone was detected in three samples. Histological outcome was available for 167 nodules, 81 of which proved malignant: all the 48 with suspicious or malignant cytology; 25 out of 56 (44.6%) with indeterminate and 8 out of 57 (14%) with benign cytology. BRAF mutations were associated with worse tumors pathological features. The presence of RAS mutations was indicative of follicular-patterned malignancies in 5 out of 8 benign nodules and 9 out of 11 indeterminate nodules. CONCLUSIONS: Our study established mutational rates for BRAF and RAS genes in a large series of FNA specimens. BRAF mutations were confirmed as highly specific but not able to improve cytological diagnosis, while RAS testing proved effective in assessing malignancy in nodules with indeterminate and benign cytology.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]