These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The influence of supplemental zinc and ractopamine hydrochloride on trace mineral and nitrogen retention of beef steers.
    Author: Carmichael RN, Genther-Schroeder ON, Blank CP, Deters EL, Hartman SJ, Niedermayer EK, Hansen SL.
    Journal: J Anim Sci; 2018 Jun 29; 96(7):2939-2948. PubMed ID: 29733402.
    Abstract:
    The study objective was to determine whether N retention was improved with supplemental Zn above NRC concentrations with or without ractopamine hydrochloride inclusion. Angus crossbred steers (n = 32, 485 ± 26 kg BW) with Genemax gain scores of 4 or 5 were utilized in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement (8 steers/treatment). Steers were blocked by BW to a finishing diet with 1 of 2 mineral supplementation strategies (ZNTRT), no supplemental Zn (analyzed 32 mg Zn/kg DM; CON) or supranutritional Zn (CON + 60 ppm ZnSO4 + 60 ppm Zn-amino acid complex; analyzed 145 mg Zn/kg DM; SUPZN), fed 56 days in pens equipped with GrowSafe bunks and assigned to β-agonist (BA) supplementation strategies of 0 (NON) or 300 mg steer-1 d-1 ractopamine hydrochloride (RAC) fed the last 30 d before harvest. Initial 56-d ADG was not affected by ZNTRT (P = 0.66), but DMI was greater in CON vs. SUPZN (P < 0.01). On day 56 (day 1 of BA supplementation), steers (4 groups; 8 steers/group; 2 steers/treatment) were moved to metabolism crates and adapted for 10 d, followed by 5 d of total fecal and urine collection. Total retention of Zn, Mn, Fe, Cu, and N were calculated. Data were analyzed as a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement, with group as a fixed effect and the 3-way interaction of ZNTRT × BA × group as random. No interactions between ZNTRT and BA were noted for any data (P ≥ 0.19). Collection DMI did not differ among treatments (P ≥ 0.23); however, Zn intake was lesser in CON vs. SUPZN (P < 0.01). Fecal and urinary Zn excretion and Zn and Mn retention were lesser in CON vs. SUPZN (P ≤ 0.03); however, Zn retention was not different between NON and RAC (P = 0.43). Retention of Cu and Fe was unaffected by strategies (P ≥ 0.49). Urine output and urine N excretion were greater in NON vs. RAC (P ≤ 0.05). Nitrogen retention (as percent of N intake) was lesser (P = 0.05) in CON (40.0%) vs. SUPZN (44.3%) and lesser (P = 0.02) in NON (39.5%) vs. RAC (44.8%). Zinc and N retention were found to be positively correlated (r = 0.46, P < 0.01). Average daily gain and G:F across the 86-d trial were lesser in NON vs. RAC (P < 0.03). Overall, SUPZN appears to improve N retention, suggesting that increasing dietary Zn may be important for cattle growth beyond that induced by ractopamine hydrochloride.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]