These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Bovine foetal sex determination-Different DNA extraction and amplification approaches for efficient livestock production.
    Author: Ristanic M, Stanisic L, Maletic M, Glavinic U, Draskovic V, Aleksic N, Stanimirovic Z.
    Journal: Reprod Domest Anim; 2018 Aug; 53(4):947-954. PubMed ID: 29740884.
    Abstract:
    Foetal sex determination using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in mammals is based on the amplification of gender-specific foetal DNA sequences circulating in maternal blood. The bovine synepitheliochorial placenta does not allow a direct contact between the trophoblast and the maternal blood, resulting in difficult passage of foetal DNA and, consequently, its very small amounts in maternal bloodstream. Circulating cell-free foetal DNA (ccffDNA) encompasses short nucleotide fragments (300-600 bp) in maternal circulation. The aim of this study was to assess this non-invasive method in accurate prenatal sexing in early and late gestational periods in comparison with ultrasound diagnostics. As various DNA isolation and amplification methods were tested, their success in obtaining reliable results was evaluated. Two groups were tested, each consisting of 20 pregnant cows. Blood of a bull and a non-pregnant heifer was the controls. Extraction of foetal DNA was accomplished by three different methods: using tubes with silicone membranes, a single-tube extraction without silicone membranes and phenol-chloroform extraction. Following each extraction method, foetal DNA was amplified using PCR and real-time PCR with both bAML and TSPY primers in a separate reaction. Positive results were obtained only after amplification of foetal DNA extracted with a single-tube extraction kit. In comparison with ultrasound examination results and foetal gender recorded at birth, the sensitivity of the PCR test was 90% in Group I, but the technique failed to detect male foetuses in Group II. The real-time PCR test sensitivity in Group I was 90% and in Group II 91.6%.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]