These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Use of Polidocanol Endovenous Microfoam to Improve Hemodynamics and Symptomology in Patients with Challenging Clinical Presentations: A Case Series.
    Author: Davis PE, Phillips J, Kolluri R.
    Journal: Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Oct; 52():176-182. PubMed ID: 29772321.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) is a widely prevalent condition. Saphenous venous reflux is the most common underlying pathology that leads to CVI. Endovenous thermal ablations (ETA) are the current gold standard. However, some patients present with some unique challenges making ETA less ideal. Nonthermal nontumescent therapies could be considered as alternative therapy in these patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of treatment effects with United States Food and Drug Administration-approved polidocanol endovenous microfoam (PEM; Varithena® 1%) on venous symptomology in 10 (n = 10) C3-C6 patients with CVI and concomitant complex disease/pathology that limited the use of ETA. The pathology included risk of bruising or bleeding, severe lipodermatosclerosis, hidradenitis suppurativa, chronic fibrosis of the vein from prior superficial thrombosis, risk for nerve injury, and failed prior ETA. Before treatment, all patients underwent a venous incompetence study by duplex ultrasound (DUS). Preprocedure pain, symptoms, and Venous Clinical Severity Scores (VCSSs) were recorded. Clinical assessments and DUS were performed 4 days, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment. RESULTS: DUS demonstrated reflux in the great saphenous vein (GSV), anterior accessory GSV, and/or the small saphenous vein. Pain scores and VCSS were reduced 4 days and 6 weeks after treatment. These lower scores were maintained for up to 1 year after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: PEM use in C3-C6 patients resulted in successful improvement in VCSS, CVI symptoms, and wound healing among patients in whom ETA was not considered to be the optimal therapy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]