These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Evaluation of nutritional care of hospitalized children in a tertiary pediatric hospital.
    Author: De Longueville C, Robert M, Debande M, Podlubnai S, Defourny S, Namane SA, Pace A, Brans C, Cayrol E, Goyens P, De Laet C.
    Journal: Clin Nutr ESPEN; 2018 Jun; 25():157-162. PubMed ID: 29779812.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hospitalized children are at risk of malnutrition. The aim of the present study was to evaluate a clinical practice in a tertiary hospital. The nutritional team developed a specific software for screening of malnutrition and risk of malnutrition (Evalnut) that provides also recommendations for the nutritional management of the patient. The data recorded into this program and the tool itself were analyzed and optimizations are highlighted. METHODS: A retrospective study analyzed the data collected in 2015 during 4931 consecutive hospitalizations (3984 children) at the University Children's Hospital Queen Fabiola. Pivot tables analysis (Excel) of the database of the screening tool was compared with the clinical practice of the dietitians. First data processing excluded records with abnormal or missing values. Impact of nutritional care analysis needs at least 2 evaluations and a positive patient's height trend. In case of height equality, only length of hospital stays less than 2 weeks were kept. RESULTS: This study highlighted inaccurate database records related to imperfections of the computer program, missing or erroneous measures and incomplete encoding. First analysis on 3219 valid hospitalizations showed statistical correlations. Prevalence of malnutrition on admission was 33%, split into 14,5% acute malnutrition, 15% chronic malnutrition and 3,5% mixed malnutrition. Overall, 30,3% of the children were categorized at risk of developing malnutrition during their stay. Positive impact of nutritional management on the resulting nutritional status was demonstrated on the second data selection (352 hospitalizations): WFH median (interquartile range) increased from 96,1% (87,1-106,4) on admission to 96,9% (89,1-106,1) (p < 0,01) on discharge. An optimization of the existing software was finally proposed. CONCLUSION: In our hospital, the dietitians are the most aware on the importance of nutritional assessment and management during hospitalization. Encouraging results are obtained. Inclusion of a nutritional program in the medical file is useful to raise interest amongst caregivers and is particularly valuable for the nutritional follow up of the patients by the nutrition team.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]