These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The utility of the combined use of 123I-FP-CIT SPECT and neuromelanin MRI in differentiating Parkinson's disease from other parkinsonian syndromes.
    Author: Matsusue E, Fujihara Y, Tanaka K, Aozasa Y, Shimoda M, Nakayasu H, Nakamura K, Ogawa T.
    Journal: Acta Radiol; 2019 Feb; 60(2):230-238. PubMed ID: 29804474.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Neuromelanin magnetic resonance imaging (NmMRI) and 123I-FP-CIT dopamine transporter single photon emission computed tomography (DAT-SPECT) provide specific information that distinguishes Parkinson's disease (PD) from non-degenerative parkinsonian syndrome (NDPS). PURPOSE: To determine whether a multiparametric scoring system (MSS) could improve accuracy compared to each parameter of DAT-SPECT and NmMRI in differentiating PD from NDPS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 49 patients, including 14 with NDPS, 30 with PD, and five with atypical parkinsonian disorder (APD) underwent both NmMRI and DAT-SPECT and were evaluated. The average (Ave) and the asymmetry index (AI) were calculated in the substantia nigra compacta area (SNc-area), SNc midbrain-tegmentum contrast ratio (SNc-CR), and specific binding ratio (SBR). Cut-off values were determined, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, for the differentiation of PD from NDPS on the statistically significant parameters. All cases were scored as either 1 (PD) or 0 (NDPS) for each parameter according to its threshold. These individual scores were totaled for each case, yielding a combined score for each case to obtain a cut-off value for the MSS. RESULTS: The Ave-SNc-area, Ave-SNc-CR, and Ave-SBR in PD were significantly lower than those in NDPS. The AI-SNc-area and AI-SBR in PD were significantly higher than those in NDPS. Of the five parameters, the highest accuracy was 93% for the Ave-SNc-area. For the MSS, a cut-off value of 3 was the accuracy of 96%. Besides, no significant difference was observed between PD and APD on all parameters. CONCLUSION: An MSS has comparable or better accuracy compared to each parameter of DAT-SPECT and NmMRI in distinguishing PD from NDPS.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]