These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Evaluation of the Vitek MS and the MALDI Biotyper systems for the identification of less commonly isolated but clinically relevant anaerobes and facultative anaerobes.
    Author: Ferrand J, Bonnet I, Alauzet C, Lozniewski A.
    Journal: Anaerobe; 2018 Dec; 54():210-216. PubMed ID: 29857042.
    Abstract:
    The Vitek MS and MALDI Biotyper systems were evaluated for the identification of 221 strains belonging to less commonly isolated anaerobes and facultative anaerobes. Identifications were performed using direct deposit (DD), on-target extraction (FA) and full extraction (EXT). After DD, 29.9% and 34.3% of Gram-positive isolates (n = 137) as well as 36.9% and 58.3% of Gram-negative isolates (n = 84) were identified at the species-level with the Vitek-MS and the Biotyper system, respectively. The rates of correct species identification with the Biotyper system were significantly increased after extraction for Gram-positive isolates (FA: 75.2%, EXT: 78.1%) and Gram-negative isolates (FA: 72.6%, EXT: 78.6%). Extraction permitted to achieve higher correct species identification rates only for Gram-positive isolates (FA: 35.8%, EXT: 36.5%) with the Vitek MS. Thus, the accuracy of both systems needs to be further increased by expanding the databases. In the meantime, we recommend using a preliminary extraction step to obtain reliable results at least for the identification of Gram positive anaerobic bacteria with both systems.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]