These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: High-intensity Interval Training in Different Exercise Modes: Lessons from Time to Exhaustion.
    Author: Sousa AC, Fernandes RJ, Boas JPV, Figueiredo P.
    Journal: Int J Sports Med; 2018 Sep; 39(9):668-673. PubMed ID: 29925107.
    Abstract:
    To provide information for high-intensity interval training (HIIT) load, we compared the temporal variables of VO2 response at, and after, a time sustained at the exercise intensity corresponding to VO2max (Tlim) in different exercise modes. Forty-five trained male swimmers (11), rowers (13), runners (10) and cyclists (11) completed an incremental protocol to determine the velocity (vVO2max) or power (wVO2max) at VO2max and a square wave exercise from rest to 100% of vVO2max/wVO2max. The temporal variables of VO2 response were examined using a breath-by-breath gas analyzer. VO2 responses were not different between exercise modes, except for the percentage of VO2max at 50% of Tlim, which was ~6% higher in rowing compared to cycling (97.70±2.90 vs 92.40±5.69%, p=0.013). During the recovery period, both swimmers and rowers evidenced higher percentages of VO2max compared to cyclists at 30 s (65.1±10.4 and 65.7±5.6 vs 52.7±5.6%) and 60 s (41.7±10.8 and 38.4±5.4 vs 30.4±1.8%) time periods, all for p<0.01. Furthermore, swimmers presented higher time values to reach 50% VO2max compared to runners and cyclists (51.1±15.6 vs 38.1±6.7 and 33.8±4.7%; p<0.001). When training at 100% of VO2max intensity, fixed intervals for HIIT could be set freely. However, recovery periods based on time or intensity are exercise-mode dependent.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]