These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Sex Differences in the Prognostic Power of Brain Natriuretic Peptide and N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide for Cardiovascular Events - The Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure Study.
    Author: Taki M, Ishiyama Y, Mizuno H, Komori T, Kono K, Hoshide S, Kario K.
    Journal: Circ J; 2018 Jul 25; 82(8):2096-2102. PubMed ID: 29925742.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) are prognostic biomarkers. Although these 2 peptides differ with regard to biological characteristics, there are few reports on the differences between BNP and NT-proBNP with regard to cardiovascular events or according to sex. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2012, this study analyzed 3,610 of 4,310 Japanese outpatients (mean age, 65 years; men, n=1,664; women, n=1,947) with a history of at least one cardiovascular event who were recruited to the Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure Study. During an average 4-year follow-up, there were 129 cardiovascular events. Both median BNP (21.1 pg/mL; IQR, 10.9-40.6 pg/mL vs. 16.2 pg/mL, IQR, 7.2-36.2 pg/mL, P<0.001) and median NT-proBNP (54.7 pg/mL; IQR, 30.2-102.6 pg/mL vs. 44.9 pg/mL, IQR, 20.7-92.6 pg/mL, P<0.001) were significantly higher in women than in men. A 1-SD increment in log-transformed BNP (hazard ratio [HR], 2.18; 95% CI: 1.53-3.10) and NT-proBNP (HR, 2.39; 95% CI: 1.73-3.31) was associated with a significant increase in cardiovascular events in women; in men, only NT-proBNP showed this association. There was an interaction between log-transformed BNP (P=0.007) or NT-proBNP (P=0.001) and cardiovascular events according to sex. CONCLUSIONS: Both BNP and NT-proBNP predicted cardiovascular outcomes in a large Japanese clinical population. BNP and NT-proBNP were significantly stronger predictors in women than in men.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]