These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Whole-body MRI for staging and interim response monitoring in paediatric and adolescent Hodgkin's lymphoma: a comparison with multi-modality reference standard including 18F-FDG-PET-CT.
    Author: Latifoltojar A, Punwani S, Lopes A, Humphries PD, Klusmann M, Menezes LJ, Daw S, Shankar A, Neriman D, Fitzke H, Clifton-Hadley L, Smith P, Taylor SA.
    Journal: Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):202-212. PubMed ID: 29948084.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To prospectively investigate concordance between whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) and a composite reference standard for initial staging and interim response evaluation in paediatric and adolescent Hodgkin's lymphoma. METHODS: Fifty patients (32 male, age range 6-19 years) underwent WB-MRI and standard investigations, including 18F-FDG-PET-CT at diagnosis and following 2-3 chemotherapy cycles. Two radiologists in consensus interpreted WB-MRI using prespecified definitions of disease positivity. A third radiologist reviewed a subset of staging WB-MRIs (n = 38) separately to test for interobserver agreement. A multidisciplinary team derived a primary reference standard using all available imaging/clinical investigations. Subsequently, a second multidisciplinary panel rereviewed all imaging with long-term follow-up data to derive an enhanced reference standard. Interobserver agreement for WB-MRI reads was tested using kappa statistics. Concordance for correct classification of all disease sites, true positive rate (TPR), false positive rate (FPR) and kappa for staging/response agreement were calculated for WB-MRI. RESULTS: There was discordance for full stage in 74% (95% CI 61.9-83.9%) and 44% (32.0-56.6%) of patients against the primary and enhanced reference standards, respectively. Against the enhanced reference standard, the WB-MRI TPR, FPR and kappa were 91%, 1% and 0.93 (0.90-0.96) for nodal disease and 79%, < 1% and 0.86 (0.77-0.95) for extra-nodal disease. WB-MRI response classification was correct in 25/38 evaluable patients (66%), underestimating response in 26% (kappa 0.30, 95% CI 0.04-0.57). There was a good agreement for nodal (kappa 0.78, 95% CI 0.73-0.84) and extra-nodal staging (kappa 0.60, 95% CI 0.41-0.78) between WB-MRI reads CONCLUSIONS: WB-MRI has reasonable accuracy for nodal and extra-nodal staging but is discordant with standard imaging in a substantial minority of patients, and tends to underestimate disease response. KEY POINTS: • This prospective single-centre study showed discordance for full patient staging of 44% between WB-MRI and a multi-modality reference standard in paediatric and adolescent Hodgkin's lymphoma. • WB-MRI underestimates interim disease response in paediatric and adolescent Hodgkin's lymphoma. • WB-MRI shows promise in paediatric and adolescent Hodgkin's lymphoma but currently cannot replace conventional staging pathways including 18F-FDG-PET-CT.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]