These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Analysis on the relationship between Occupational Stress Factors and Psychological Stress Reaction among Petrochemical Workers].
    Author: Ren MX, Tian HE, Ma L, Zhou LP, Wang Y.
    Journal: Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2018 Apr 20; 36(4):247-250. PubMed ID: 29996241.
    Abstract:
    Objective: To explore the relationship between occupational stress factors and psychological stress reaction among petrochemical workers, detecting the effects caused by the occupational stress and putting forward solutions to reduce the occupational stress degree. Methods: 392 petrochemical workers in Oil refining enterprise were included to conduct the evaluation of the occupational stress, correlation analysis and ridge regression were used to analyze the relationship between occupational stress and five aspects of psychological stress reaction and to detect the influencing factors. Results: Mission control, decision control, environmental control, resources control, promotion, and participation in decision making were positively correlated with job satisfaction (P<0.01) , technology utilization degree, work order tonality, job prospects were negatively correlated with job satisfaction (P<0.05) ; mission control, resource control, promotion, participation in decision-making were positively correlated with mental health (P<0.01) , work order tonality, job prospects were negatively correlated with mental health (P<0.05) ; load change risk, work, work order tonality, job prospects were positively correlated with depression (P<0.05) resource control, promotion opportunities were negatively correlated with depression (P<0.05) ; quantitative risk load, work, work order tonality, job prospects were positively correlated with anxiety (P<0.05) , the task control, promotion, and participation in decision-making were negatively correlated with anxiety (P<0.05) ; work, load change, work order tonality, risk scoring for job prospects were positively correlated with body complaint (P<0.01) , mission control, decision control, resource control were negatively correlated with body complaint (P<0.05) . Conclusion: Different stress factors make different effects in different psychological stress reaction, the main predictors and predictive power of each psychological stress reaction were not the same. 目的： 研究心理性应激反应与职业应激的关系，探究影响化工工人心理性应激反应的职业应激因素，为减轻化工工人职业应激的程度提供信息。 方法： 于2016年6月~7月，对某石油炼化企业的化工部职工共392人进行职业应激评定，将心理性应激反应的5个方面与职业应激分别进行相关性分析与岭回归分析，探讨化工工人心理性应激反应的影响因素。 结果： 任务控制、决策控制、环境控制、资源控制、提升机会、参与决策与工作满意感呈正相关（P<0.01），技术利用程度、工作单调性、工作前景与工作满意感呈负相关（P<0.05）；任务控制、资源控制、提升机会、参与决策与心理健康呈正相关（P<0.01），工作单调性、工作前景与心理健康呈负相关（P<0.05）；负荷变化、工作危险性、工作单调性、工作前景与抑郁症状呈正相关（P<0.05），资源控制、提升机会与抑郁症状呈负相关（P<0.05）；定量负荷、工作危险性、工作单调性、工作前景与焦虑状态呈正相关（P<0.05），任务控制、提升机会、参与决策与焦虑状态呈负相关（P<0.05）；工作危险性、负荷变化、工作单调性、工作前景与和躯体抱怨呈正相关（P<0.01），任务控制、决策控制、资源控制与躯体抱怨呈负相关（P<0.05）。 结论： 不同的应激因素在不同的应激反应中所起的作用不同，每个应激反应的主要预测因素和预测力也不尽相同。.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]