These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Vitamin D deficiency rickets: single-dose therapy versus continuous therapy].
    Author: Stögmann W, Sacher M, Blümel P, Woloszczuk W.
    Journal: Padiatr Padol; 1985; 20(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 3001619.
    Abstract:
    This is a comparative study of massive single dose treatment (400 000 I. U. vitamin D3, divided in 2 X 200 000 I. U. on day 1 and day 3, orally) versus continuous treatment (9600 I. U. vitamin D3-drops for 18 days) of vitamin D-deficiency rickets (VDR). To estimate the effectiveness of these two kinds of treatment the serum concentrations of calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), alkaline phosphatase (aP), calcitriol (25-OH-CC), parathyroid hormone (PTH) and calcitonin (Ct) before and during treatment (on day 3, 7, 14, 21) were studied in 10 patients, 5 in each group, with VDR. There was no difference in the course of serum concentrations of Ca, P and aP in these two treatment-groups. The elevated PTH returned more quickly to normal range in the single dose study group. Ct-serum concentrations showed too different courses in the studied patients, therefore no comparison could be made. 25-OH-CC showed a very quick increase in the single dose-group and a slower one in the continuous treatment group the climax in both groups reached a value far over the tentative range. According to these results an unequivocal better effect of one of these two compared VDR-treatments could not be seen, what means that both treatments can be recommended.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]