These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Sonographic Features of Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted MR Images: Differentiating Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    Author: Park KJ, Kim MH, Kim JK, Cho KS.
    Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):605-613. PubMed ID: 30040467.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to characterize and assess the diagnostic utility of sonographic features of minimal-fat angiomyolipoma (AML) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with regard to small (< 4 cm) renal masses with a predominantly low signal intensity (SI) on T2-weighted MR images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty small renal masses with a predominantly low SI on T2-weighted MR images and no macroscopic fat, all of which had US images available, were assessed. MRI variables (T2 ratio, signal intensity index [SII], and tumor-to-spleen ratio on chemical-shift images), CT features (enhancement patterns and attenuations values on unenhanced images and images obtained in the corticomedullary and nephrographic phases), and sonographic features (echogenicity, heterogeneity, and the presence of acoustic shadowing, a hypoechoic rim, or an intratumoral cyst) were recorded in a blinded manner. Echo-genicity was classified as hypo-, iso-, or hyperechoic compared with the renal parenchyma or markedly hyperchoic when equivalent to that of the renal sinus fat. RESULTS: Minimal-fat AML and RCC were confirmed in 22 and 28 patients, respectively. T2 ratios were significantly lower for minimal-fat AML versus RCCs (p = 0.044). Minimal-fat AMLs exhibited echogenicities that were considered hypoechoic (31.8%), isoechoic (4.5%), hyperechoic (18.2%), or markedly hyperechoic (45.5%). No RCC showed marked hyperechogenicity. CT attenuation values were significantly higher for the minimal-fat AMLs seen in all imaging phases. When the combination of the T2 ratio, nephrographic phase attenuation, and echogenicity was assessed, the AUC value was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.81-0.98), which was a significant increase over the AUC value of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.69-0.92) for noted the combination of the T2 ratio and nephrographic phase attenuation. CONCLUSION: Additional reviews of the echogenicity of small renal masses with low SI on T2-weighted MR images may aid the diagnosis of minimal-fat AML.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]