These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Exercise Response Variations in Skeletal Muscle PCr Recovery Rate and Insulin Sensitivity Relate to Muscle Epigenomic Profiles in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes.
    Author: Stephens NA, Brouwers B, Eroshkin AM, Yi F, Cornnell HH, Meyer C, Goodpaster BH, Pratley RE, Smith SR, Sparks LM.
    Journal: Diabetes Care; 2018 Oct; 41(10):2245-2254. PubMed ID: 30072402.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Some individuals with type 2 diabetes do not reap metabolic benefits from exercise training, yet the underlying mechanisms of training response variation are largely unexplored. We classified individuals with type 2 diabetes (n = 17) as nonresponders (n = 6) or responders (n = 11) based on changes in phosphocreatine (PCr) recovery rate after 10 weeks of aerobic training. We aimed to determine whether the training response variation in PCr recovery rate was marked by distinct epigenomic profiles in muscle prior to training. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: PCr recovery rate as an indicator of in vivo muscle mitochondrial function in vastus lateralis (31P-magnetic resonance spectroscopy), insulin sensitivity (M-value; hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp), aerobic capacity (Vo2peak), and blood profiles were determined pretraining and post-training. Muscle biopsies were performed pretraining in vastus lateralis for the isolation of primary skeletal muscle cells (HSkMCs) and assessments of global DNA methylation and RNA sequencing in muscle tissue and HSkMCs. RESULTS: By design, nonresponders decreased and responders increased PCr recovery rate with training. In nonresponders, insulin sensitivity did not improve and glycemic control (HbA1c) worsened. In responders, insulin sensitivity improved. Vo2peak improved by ∼12% in both groups. Nonresponders and responders were distinguished by distinct pretraining molecular (DNA methylation, RNA expression) patterns in muscle tissue, as well as in HSkMCs. Enrichment analyses identified elevations in glutathione regulation, insulin signaling, and mitochondrial metabolism in nonresponders pretraining, which was reflected in vivo by higher pretraining PCr recovery rate and insulin sensitivity in these same individuals. CONCLUSIONS: A training response variation for clinical risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes is reflected by distinct basal myocellular epigenomic profiles in muscle tissue, some of which are maintained in HSkMCs, suggesting a cell-autonomous underpinning. Our data provide new evidence to potentially shift the diabetes treatment paradigm for individuals who do not benefit from training, such that supplemental treatment can be designed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]